From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | PostgresSQL General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS |
Date: | 2002-08-13 17:10:19 |
Message-ID: | 20020813131019.K31856@mail.libertyrms.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 01:04:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I see no really good reason to change the file-split logic. The places
> where the backend might possibly need large-file support are
> * backend-side COPY to or from a large file
I _think_ this causes a crash. At least, I _think_ that's what
caused it one day (I was doing one of those jackhammer-the-server
sorts of tests, and it was one of about 50 things I was doing at the
time, to see if I could make it fall over. I did, but not where I
expected, and way beyond any real load we could anticipate).
> * postmaster log to stderr --- does this fail if log output
> exceeds 2G?
Yes, definitely, at least on Solaris.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 87 Mowat Avenue
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M6K 3E3
+1 416 646 3304 x110
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jon Swinth | 2002-08-13 17:42:07 | Re: Transaction Exception Question |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-13 17:04:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-08-13 17:18:32 | Re: libpqxx |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-13 17:04:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS |