Re: Future of src/utils

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Future of src/utils
Date: 2002-07-17 22:31:31
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0207172056500.9047-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> > assemble all the files we need (as determined by configure) into a static
> > library and link all executables with that. That way we don't have to
> > deal with the individual files in each individual makefile.
>
> I like that a lot. But will it work for libpq?

No, just for executables. Otherwise you'd get into a big PIC mess.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-07-17 22:32:29 Re: Future of src/utils
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-17 22:28:55 Re: Issues Outstanding for Point In Time Recovery (PITR)