Re: Future of src/utils

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Future of src/utils
Date: 2002-07-18 00:29:54
Message-ID: 200207180029.g6I0Tsr25288@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > > assemble all the files we need (as determined by configure) into a static
> > > library and link all executables with that. That way we don't have to
> > > deal with the individual files in each individual makefile.
> >
> > I like that a lot. But will it work for libpq?
>
> No, just for executables. Otherwise you'd get into a big PIC mess.

Oh, OK, so we keep the same object file variables, but just move them to
src/port.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-18 00:32:21 Re: utils C files
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-18 00:27:09 Re: Issues Outstanding for Point In Time Recovery (PITR)