Re: tuning questions

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Jack Coates <jack(at)lyris(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tuning questions
Date: 2003-12-04 18:12:30
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0312041111470.17542-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Scott,
>
> > Just to add to what the others have said here, you probably want to run
> > the pg_autovacuum daemon in the background. It comes with 7.4 but will
> > work fine with 7.3.
>
> I don't recommend using pg_autovacuum with a data transformation task. pg_av
> is designed for "regular use" not huge batch tasks.

What bad thing is likely to happen if it's used here? Fire too often or
use too much I/O bandwidth? Would that be fixed by the patch being tested
to introduce a delay every x pages of vacuuming?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gaetano Mendola 2003-12-04 18:35:32 Re: autovacuum daemon stops doing work after about an hour
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-12-04 18:11:52 Re: tuning questions

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gaetano Mendola 2003-12-04 18:35:32 Re: autovacuum daemon stops doing work after about an hour
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-12-04 18:11:52 Re: tuning questions