| From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Brain dump: btree collapsing |
| Date: | 2003-02-28 17:57:27 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0302281053420.20805-100000@css120.ihs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> How about working on hash indexes? They have several problems at the moment
> that make them unusable:
> [SNIP]
> Since you already have experience in the postgres indexing arena, you could
> transfer your skills to this new index method easily?
> [SNIP]
> Also, how about looking at the fact that you cannot store constants in
> functional indexes?
both of these would be most useful. I'd vote for hash indexes first, but
not being able to use constants in functional indexes is a giant pain as
well.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brandon Craig Rhodes | 2003-02-28 18:17:30 | result relation used anymore? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-02-28 16:40:40 | Re: Can pessimistic locking be emulated? |