From: | Alex Knight <knight(at)phunc(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
Cc: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2001-06-27 20:45:33 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0106271343490.18309-100000@blowfish.phunc.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 June 2001 16:15, Alex Knight wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > > Disagreed over here, with 4+ years of experience 24x7 on RHL since RHL
> > > 4.1.
>
> > This 4+ years 24/7 experience isn't on that server you said was for
> > internal purposes with low load you mentioned in a previous post, is it?
>
> No. This one has been streaming our RealAudio stream 24x7 since May 1, 1997
> (minus a few hours for maintenance -- you know, things like replacing failed
> power supplies, replacing/installing hard drives, upgradingthe OS, etc.
> Still running the same Super Micro dual PPro 200 motherboard -- but 192MB now
> instead of the 64MB we started with. ECC, of course. Will be replacing with
> the 'lightly loaded' PIII-600 w/ 1GB as soon as Real Networks supports kernel
> 2.4.) -- along with mail, DNS, and seven domains worth of webservice. Not
> terribly heavy loaded -- but we can and do saturate our T1.
Even though it may appear that your server is doing a lot, it's not facing
the load of a highly scaled enterprise level e-commerce site, where RedHat
just doesn't cut it.
I have a T1 to my house, and I saturate it all the time... without load :)
-Knight
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Wolfe | 2001-06-27 20:50:47 | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | David D. Kilzer | 2001-06-27 20:44:49 | Re: [PATCH] Contrib C source for casting MONEY to INT[248] and FLOAT[48] |