RE: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL

From: "Tim Mickol" <tmickol(at)combimatrix(dot)com>
To: "Alex Knight" <knight(at)phunc(dot)com>, "Lamar Owen" <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: "Vivek Khera" <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Date: 2001-06-27 22:15:28
Message-ID: NCEEJEAEIDNFKBMALPGMEEBBCEAA.tmickol@combimatrix.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

As long as it's a robust, managable, and open arhcitecture, I'm generally
agnostic as to technoliogies. That said, my red hat experience:

ran multiple java application servers and multiple oracle 8i db instances on
red hat 6.n (medium size 100-200 tables) with a moderately high
computationally and datbase intensive application. consistently ran 6 9's
uptime (what little downtime there was generally due to pilot error or buggy
code) these servers served from 10-to-25 thousand users daily. we ran many
months 100% uptime.

tjm

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Alex Knight
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 1:46 PM
To: Lamar Owen
Cc: Vivek Khera; pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL

On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:

> On Wednesday 27 June 2001 16:15, Alex Knight wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > > Disagreed over here, with 4+ years of experience 24x7 on RHL since RHL
> > > 4.1.
>
> > This 4+ years 24/7 experience isn't on that server you said was for
> > internal purposes with low load you mentioned in a previous post, is it?
>
> No. This one has been streaming our RealAudio stream 24x7 since May 1,
1997
> (minus a few hours for maintenance -- you know, things like replacing
failed
> power supplies, replacing/installing hard drives, upgradingthe OS, etc.
> Still running the same Super Micro dual PPro 200 motherboard -- but 192MB
now
> instead of the 64MB we started with. ECC, of course. Will be replacing
with
> the 'lightly loaded' PIII-600 w/ 1GB as soon as Real Networks supports
kernel
> 2.4.) -- along with mail, DNS, and seven domains worth of webservice. Not
> terribly heavy loaded -- but we can and do saturate our T1.

Even though it may appear that your server is doing a lot, it's not facing
the load of a highly scaled enterprise level e-commerce site, where RedHat
just doesn't cut it.

I have a T1 to my house, and I saturate it all the time... without load :)

-Knight

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Knight 2001-06-27 22:16:36 Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Previous Message Alex Knight 2001-06-27 22:12:16 Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL