| From: | "D(dot) Hageman" <dhageman(at)dracken(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL CURSOR support |
| Date: | 2001-05-30 18:33:33 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0105301330540.2029-100000@typhon.dracken.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> So FOR is standard ANSI, and IS is Oracle, and we went with Oracle.
> Should we allow both?
>
I have the opinion that PostgreSQL should always support ANSI first and
*then* go ahead and add the features that are becoming the standard due
to inclusion in a major database system like Oracle. As such, I think it
would be wise to allow both.
--
//========================================================\\
|| D. Hageman <dhageman(at)dracken(dot)com> ||
\\========================================================//
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2001-05-30 18:39:26 | Re: Support for %TYPE in CREATE FUNCTION |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-05-30 18:30:51 | Re: PL/pgSQL CURSOR support |