| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL CURSOR support |
| Date: | 2001-05-30 18:30:51 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0105302029510.757-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck writes:
> There is no
> reason other than that we'll have more PL handlers to
> support,
... which is a pretty big reason ...
> why we shouldn't have two or three different
> procedural SQL dialects. All can coexist and only those used
> in your DB schema will get loaded.
Or you can make one PL support alternative, non-conflicting dialects.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | D. Hageman | 2001-05-30 18:33:33 | Re: PL/pgSQL CURSOR support |
| Previous Message | Ian Lance Taylor | 2001-05-30 18:01:54 | Re: Support for %TYPE in CREATE FUNCTION |