From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Locale support is now on by default |
Date: | 2002-04-03 22:16:34 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0204031712230.684-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian writes:
> > There doesn't seem to be a way to turn off LOG without hiding almost
> > everything:
> >
> > if (lev == LOG || lev == COMMERROR)
> > {
> > if (server_min_messages == LOG)
> > output_to_server = true;
> > else if (server_min_messages < FATAL)
> > output_to_server = true;
> > }
> >
> > Everything except for PANIC is less than FATAL, so this doesn't make sense
> > to me.
>
> Actually, what this is saying is that for an elog(LOG) to show, the
> server_min_messages, must be less than FATAL.
I know what this is saying, but the coding is redundant (since LOG is also
less than FATAL).
> Setting server_min_messages to FATAL means only FATAL and PANIC
> appear:
>
> Server levels are:
>
> # debug5, debug4, debug3, debug2, debug1,
> # info, notice, warning, error, log, fatal, panic
I don't recall log being so high. Didn't it use to be after info?
Certainly there should be a way to see only warnings, errors, and higher
without seeing the "unimportant" log messages. Actually, I'm also
confused why we now have info, notice, *and* warning. Shouldn't two of
these be enough?
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-04-03 22:26:44 | Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-03 22:15:02 | Re: Question: update and transaction isolation |