Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL
Date: 2002-03-22 16:38:27
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0203221133220.787-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:

> So then how is it any more wrong than SET NOT NULL?

You're right.

> It should almost be ADD NOT NULL ...

I like that.

It also makes sense because the standard syntax is to ADD/DROP CHECK
constraints, to which NOT NULL constraints are equivalent.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-03-22 16:41:29 Re: Problem with reloading groups in pg_hba.conf
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-03-22 16:23:31 Re: pg_control contents