| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: syslog by default? |
| Date: | 2001-09-12 12:07:40 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0109121402310.694-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii writes:
> Why are you so worrying about finding syslog() in configure? We have
> already done lots of function testings. Is there anything special with
> syslog()?
All the other functions we test for come with a replacement plan. Either
we choose between several similar alternatives (atexit/on_exit), or we
link in our own function.o file. But we don't shut off a whole piece of
functionality when one goes missing (except in the cases I mentioned).
I'm probably being paranoid. But you did ask what became of the idea, and
that's what did, as far as I'm concerned...
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomasz Myrta | 2001-09-12 12:22:18 | dynamic-static date |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2001-09-12 10:23:19 | Re: enable-unicode-conversion option? |