Re: syslog by default?

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: syslog by default?
Date: 2001-09-12 00:59:50
Message-ID: 20010912095950W.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Tatsuo Ishii writes:
>
> > There was a discussion about --enable-syslog by default. What was the
> > consensus? I think this is a good one.
>
> It would be a good one if we make the blind assumption that syslog()
> exists on all platforms. That is possible, but not guaranteed. (BeOS,
> QNX, Cygwin?)
>
> The alternative suggestion to turn it off if syslog() is not found makes
> me wary. These schemes have invariably lead to problems in the past.
> Recall libpq++ being missed because of false test results, readline
> support mysteriously disappearing and nobody noticing until Mandrake had
> shipped their CDs. There are possible scenarios where syslog support
> could be missed by configure, such as when you need some compat or bsd
> library.

Why are you so worrying about finding syslog() in configure? We have
already done lots of function testings. Is there anything special with
syslog()?
--
Tatsuo Ishii

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-09-12 01:35:33 Re: factorial doc bug?
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-09-12 00:59:35 Re: factorial doc bug?