| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, Shane Wegner <shane(at)cm(dot)nu> |
| Subject: | Re: Permissions for large-object comments |
| Date: | 2001-08-25 00:45:40 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0108250241590.677-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> Shane Wegner <shane(at)cm(dot)nu> writes:
> > test=> \lo_unlink 89803
> > ERROR: pg_description: Permission denied.
>
> Hmm. Maybe those client-side comment manipulations in psql aren't
> such a hot idea. I know I never tested them as non-superuser :-(
:-(
> Shane, try that from a superuser Postgres userid. Meanwhile,
> it's back to the drawing board for us.
I'm not sure about the future of the large objects, so I'm less eager to
invent a new mechanism. I'm open to ideas, however.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shane Wegner | 2001-08-25 00:48:18 | Re: Permissions for large-object comments |
| Previous Message | Rob Arnold | 2001-08-24 23:12:07 | Re: problems transfering databases |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shane Wegner | 2001-08-25 00:48:18 | Re: Permissions for large-object comments |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-08-25 00:37:48 | Re: /bin/ld -G vs /usr/ccs/bin/cc -G |