Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Java class documentation

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Java class documentation
Date: 2001-02-24 23:28:33
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0102250022550.1725-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-jdbc
Peter Mount writes:

> Actually I was waiting until 7.1 was out before rewriting the jdbc docs
> >from scratch (so much has changed since those were written).

I can see that.  However, 7.1 users should still get the benefit of
reasonably up to date documentation.  I've at least changed all package
references to 'org.postgresql' and said something about ant, plus some
spell checking and polishing.  Perhaps you can scan it to make sure it's
not complete garbage.

Peter Eisentraut      peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: LEAVITT,MARSHA (HP-FtCollins,ex1)Date: 2001-02-25 02:22:33
Subject: Page not found error
Previous:From: Peter MountDate: 2001-02-24 18:03:03
Subject: Re: Java class documentation

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Ingo LuetkebohleDate: 2001-02-25 01:20:07
Subject: Concurrency supported?
Previous:From: Peter MountDate: 2001-02-24 18:08:10
Subject: Re: RE: f is not a valid bitstring

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group