From: | Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Java class documentation |
Date: | 2001-03-01 20:01:43 |
Message-ID: | 5.0.2.1.0.20010301200047.0221bd20@mail.retep.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-jdbc |
At 00:28 25/02/01 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>Peter Mount writes:
>
> > Actually I was waiting until 7.1 was out before rewriting the jdbc docs
> > >from scratch (so much has changed since those were written).
>
>I can see that. However, 7.1 users should still get the benefit of
>reasonably up to date documentation. I've at least changed all package
>references to 'org.postgresql' and said something about ant, plus some
>spell checking and polishing. Perhaps you can scan it to make sure it's
>not complete garbage.
>
>http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/jdbc.html
Ok, I will do.
Sorry for the late reply, it's been a hectic week and its the first time
I've had to even use my home machine since Sunday :-(
Peter
>--
>Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | R. Grela | 2001-03-02 04:04:59 | Embedded SQL |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-02-28 19:29:31 | Re: Documentation for PyGreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Mount | 2001-03-01 20:03:29 | Re: Concurrency supported? |
Previous Message | Philip Crotwell | 2001-03-01 14:31:22 | Blobs and length +- 1 |