Re: Java class documentation

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Java class documentation
Date: 2001-02-24 23:28:33
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0102250022550.1725-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-jdbc

Peter Mount writes:

> Actually I was waiting until 7.1 was out before rewriting the jdbc docs
> >from scratch (so much has changed since those were written).

I can see that. However, 7.1 users should still get the benefit of
reasonably up to date documentation. I've at least changed all package
references to 'org.postgresql' and said something about ant, plus some
spell checking and polishing. Perhaps you can scan it to make sure it's
not complete garbage.

http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/jdbc.html

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message LEAVITT,MARSHA (HP-FtCollins,ex1) 2001-02-25 02:22:33 Page not found error
Previous Message Peter Mount 2001-02-24 18:03:03 Re: Java class documentation

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ingo Luetkebohle 2001-02-25 01:20:07 Concurrency supported?
Previous Message Peter Mount 2001-02-24 18:08:10 Re: RE: f is not a valid bitstring