Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL

From: <kaiq(at)realtyideas(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Clark C(dot) Evans" <clark(dot)evans(at)manhattanproject(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL
Date: 1999-12-27 16:06:47
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.10.9912271003590.15801-100000@picasso.realtyideas.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

data warehouse related capability. e.g., table space, table split, bitmap
index, using multiple indices in one query, star-schema optimization.

On Sat, 25 Dec 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> >
> >
> > On Sat, 25 Dec 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > My big question is, what new challenges will we face as
> > > we become more popular?
> >
> > Plug-in Oracle 7 compatibility.
>
> I believe we are adding Oracle compatibility as possible. We are
> working on write-ahead log, long tuples, foreign keys, and outer joins.
> Anything else?
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
> maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>
> ************
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charles Martin 1999-12-27 18:46:48 Setting up Postgres for production web/db work
Previous Message soundar rajan 1999-12-27 14:47:51 Re: [GENERAL] Possible FAQs: single-quote and rename database