From: | Cristian Gafton <gafton(at)redhat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Edmund Mergl <E(dot)Mergl(at)bawue(dot)de>, Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, Maarten Boekhold <boekhold(at)tibco(dot)com>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Perl library (was Building Postgres) |
Date: | 1999-06-30 04:24:17 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.10.9906300022040.21304-100000@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> The rpm format would prefer to build *all* files on a source machine,
> and then move them from the rpm file into the appropriate places on
> target machines. The problem is that, apparently,
> perl Makefile.PL
> generates paths which are *very* specific to the version of perl on
That should not be the case. It depends on how the Postgres package
Makefile.PL is written, but in general it should go into a general use
perl5 directory, such as /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl, which is anything but
perl version dependant. If it generates paths that are perl version
dependent then the Makefile.PL is busted.
> One possibility is to
> simply lift all of the perl5 source tree into the rpm, and actually do
> the build on the target machine from scratch. afaik, this is *not* the
> preferred style for rpms.
No, that is definitely not th way to handle packages distributed by rpm.
Cristian
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cristian Gafton -- gafton(at)redhat(dot)com -- Red Hat, Inc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UNIX is user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cristian Gafton | 1999-06-30 04:26:12 | Re: Perl library (was Building Postgres) |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1999-06-30 03:16:55 | RE: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status |