RE: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status

Neither of these two can be added to version 6.5.1...the minor releases
are meant to be 'non-dump/initdb, bug fix only' releases, and, at least
for number 1, adding a numeric_ops would require a dump/reload ...

As for the TRUNCATE, take a look at the oracle_compat.c file in util/adt
and supply a patch that will add the appropriate functionality, and I
don't see why it can't b eadded fo r6.6 ...

On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> > [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org]On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 1999 11:11 AM
> > To: PostgreSQL-development
> > Subject: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status
> >
> >
> > We are two weeks after the 6.5 release, and the anticipated
> > problems/patches/porting issues never really materialized.
> >
> > I would suspect that fewer people are using PostgreSQL, but I know that
> > is not true. Seems the two months of beta really got out the bugs.
> >
> > What do people want to do now? Does anyone want to start on 6.6? Do we
> > want to release 6.5.1? Should we relax for a few more weeks and bask in
> > the stable release?
> >
> > I am looking for comments.
> >
>
> I have 2 questions for 6.5.1.
>
> 1. Currently we couldn't create an index on numeric type.
> Is it difficult to add numeric_ops ?
>
> 2. I love Oracle TRUNCATE statement.
> Marcus Mascari [mascarim(at)yahoo(dot)com] has already implemented
> this feature,though I haven't seen his implementation yet.
> If his implementation is right,could this new feature be added to
> 6.5.1 ?
>
> Regards.
>
> Hiroshi Inoue
> Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp
>
>

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org