| From: | Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Goran Thyni <goran(at)kyla(dot)kiruna(dot)se> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) |
| Date: | 1999-04-26 18:14:04 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.10.9904261306570.9990-100000@dragon.taral.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Goran Thyni wrote:
> Why not put what you have in the CVS? The files in src/corba is pretty
> old. I have planned to get into this because did some coding around
> the FE/BE-protocol and would love to see a clean object-based
> communication in PgSQL instead the current one. Let us see what you
> have got and what is still missing in more lightweight alternatives to
> MICO.
What I have is not worth putting in the CVS, plus it is not finalized, nor
is it working in any real way. (It's just a set of IDL files, attached.)
The most important thing we need support for is CORBA 2.2 itself, which
when I started this, was only supported by CORBA. Also, I would like
support for the LifeCycle service (I think), the Security service, the
Transaction service, and maybe others I can't think of right now.
Taral
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Todd Graham Lewis | 1999-04-26 18:16:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) |
| Previous Message | Taral | 1999-04-26 18:06:37 | Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) |