Re: Re: 4 billion record limit?

From: "Martin A(dot) Marques" <martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar>
To: brad <brad(at)kieser(dot)net>
Cc: Chris Jones <cjones(at)rightnowtech(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: 4 billion record limit?
Date: 2000-07-28 10:47:32
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.10.10007280741230.19178-100000@math.unl.edu.ar
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-novice

On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, brad wrote:

> Good point!
> Okay... 64 bit OIDs will probably just about do the trick!
> But hey, NEVER underestimate the efficiency of Linux :-)

Never underestimated it!!! Linux for SPARC or ALPHA is 64 bits!!!
The proble is Intel and the x86 platform!!

Saludos... ;-)

"And I'm happy, because you make me feel good, about me." - Melvin Udall
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martín Marqués email: martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar
Santa Fe - Argentina http://math.unl.edu.ar/~martin/
Administrador de sistemas en math.unl.edu.ar
-----------------------------------------------------------------

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2000-07-28 10:51:18 Re: Backup/dump of huge tables and performance
Previous Message Ernie 2000-07-28 10:44:04 Re: performance help

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Herbert Liechti 2000-07-28 11:36:13 Re: Async unidirectional replication
Previous Message Martin A. Marques 2000-07-28 10:36:50 Re: 4 billion record limit?