From: | "Martin A(dot) Marques" <martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar> |
---|---|
To: | brad <brad(at)kieser(dot)net> |
Cc: | Chris Jones <cjones(at)rightnowtech(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: 4 billion record limit? |
Date: | 2000-07-28 10:47:32 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.10.10007280741230.19178-100000@math.unl.edu.ar |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-novice |
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, brad wrote:
> Good point!
> Okay... 64 bit OIDs will probably just about do the trick!
> But hey, NEVER underestimate the efficiency of Linux :-)
Never underestimated it!!! Linux for SPARC or ALPHA is 64 bits!!!
The proble is Intel and the x86 platform!!
Saludos... ;-)
"And I'm happy, because you make me feel good, about me." - Melvin Udall
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martín Marqués email: martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar
Santa Fe - Argentina http://math.unl.edu.ar/~martin/
Administrador de sistemas en math.unl.edu.ar
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Philip Warner | 2000-07-28 10:51:18 | Re: Backup/dump of huge tables and performance |
Previous Message | Ernie | 2000-07-28 10:44:04 | Re: performance help |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Herbert Liechti | 2000-07-28 11:36:13 | Re: Async unidirectional replication |
Previous Message | Martin A. Marques | 2000-07-28 10:36:50 | Re: 4 billion record limit? |