Re: [HACKERS] [QUESTIONS] builtin lo_unlink(int4)? why int4 not oid?

On Sat, 13 Jun 1998, Park, Chul-Su wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> e.g.
>
> I want to delete a large object with this table
>
> CREATE TABLE image (
> name text,
> raster oid
> );
>
> -- from programmer's guide
>
> in the psql
>
> foo=> select lo_unlink(raster) from image;
> ERROR: function int4(oid) does not exist
>
> Why builtin "lo_unlink" is defined as accepting int4 not oid? Then do I
> have to do
> foo=> select lo_unlink(int4(oid_text(raster))) from image;
> OR
> define "raster" as int4? I don't think all these are good idea... Then
> how to delete "lo" in the "psql"?

I've just tested this, and I get the same thing (on 6.3.2, and yesterdays
CVS versions).

lo_unlink should be defined with oid (which I thought was the case).

A temporary way round is:

select lo_unlink(raster::int4) from image;

Hackers: Is there any reason why it's defined as an int4?

--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk or petermount(at)earthling(dot)net
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
************ Someday I may rebuild this signature completely ;-) ************
Work Homepage: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk Work EMail: peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk