Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC - update count

From: Peter T Mount <pgint(at)maidast(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Herouth Maoz <herouth(at)oumail(dot)openu(dot)ac(dot)il>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC - update count
Date: 1998-01-12 23:23:11
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.95.980112232138.27545A-100000@maidast
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

On Mon, 12 Jan 1998, Herouth Maoz wrote:

> I have a relation with snapshots of rows from another relation. I want to
> update the original relation to new values only if it is still equal to its
> snapshot. For that, I send an update in a PreparedStatement, along these
> lines:
>
> UPDATE rel
> SET col1=?, col2=?, col3=?, col4=?
> FROM snapshot
> WHERE snapshot.id = ?
> AND rel.col1 = snapshot.col1
> AND rel.col2 = snapshot.col2
> AND rel.col3 = snapshot.col3
> AND rel.col4 = snapshot.col4
>
> Well, I assume that if the row in rel is different from the snapshot, I
> will get a row count of zero returned from executeUpdate(). Instead, it
> returns 1 - whether or not the update has actually affected any row.

I think it should return 0 also.

> I checked - the original row is not updated. No other has the new values,
> so no other has been affected. And yet, it returns 1 for both a successful
> and an unsuccessful update.
>
> Is this my problem (misinterpretation of the executeUpdate API)? Or maybe
> it's a bug in the JDBC driver? Or maybe it's a PostgreSQL bug?

I'll look into it, and get back to you.

--
Peter T Mount petermount(at)earthling(dot)net or pmount(at)maidast(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk
Main Homepage: http://www.demon.co.uk/finder
Work Homepage: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk Work EMail: peter(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve 1998-01-12 23:35:06 subscribe
Previous Message Peter T Mount 1998-01-12 20:06:33 Re: [INTERFACES] Small bug fixed in PgAccess