Re: [HACKERS] New INET and CIDR types

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New INET and CIDR types
Date: 1998-10-21 11:13:13
Message-ID: Pine.HPP.3.94.981021071137.5373D-100000@cinnamon.michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 21 Oct 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> It will require an initdb for beta users moving to 6.4 final. Is this
> OK? If so, I will apply it tomorrow. If not, the type will have to be
> disabled for 6.4.
>
> The big question is how many people have _live_ data in 6.4 beta
> databases, who don't want to initdb for 6.4 final, and can't use
> pg_upgrade to move to 6.4 final.

I do, but since this is my off season it's not a big deal. I usually
keep a backup database running on another machine anyway.

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com flame-mail: /dev/null
# include <std/disclaimers.h> TEAM-OS2
Online Searchable Campground Listings http://www.camping-usa.com
"There is no outfit less entitled to lecture me about bloat
than the federal government" -- Tony Snow
==========================================================================

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 1998-10-21 12:18:50 One more bugfix
Previous Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 1998-10-21 11:12:43 Re: [HACKERS] New INET and CIDR types