| From: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion? |
| Date: | 2009-01-07 22:28:55 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.64.0901071723400.20568@westnet.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Who can set up an inherited table structure but can't remember to turn
> on constraint_exclusion?
I thought the whole point of the WIP "Auto Partitioning Patch" was exactly
to enable larger numbers of such people in the future.
--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-07 22:46:01 | Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-01-07 22:24:10 | Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion? |