From: | Peter Korsgaard <jacmet(at)control(dot)auc(dot)dk> |
---|---|
To: | Doug Semig <dougslist(at)semig(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Database cluster? |
Date: | 2000-11-30 21:16:11 |
Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.21.0011302159290.10266-100000@brille.control.auc.dk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Doug Semig wrote:
> I actually analyzed it once. I came to the conclusion that to do it right
> it would be easier to make an almost entirely new db but use the same
> external interfaces as PostgreSQL. To do a kludge of it, one might just
> implement a tier that sits between the user and a bunch of standard
> PostgreSQL backends.
>
> It'd make a neat companion project, though. Like PG/Enterprise or
> PG/Warehouse or something.
I'm currently developing a simple version of such a system as an
university project. It is a fairly simple aproach with a proxy or a
distributor in front of a bunch of standard postgresl database servers.
The proxy monitors and forwards the requests from the clients to the
database servers. If it is a read-only request the query is forwarded to
the databaseserver currently experiencing the lowest load/most free
memory, otherwise it is sent to all database servers.
This approach obviously only performs well in systems with a high ratio of
read-only queries, such as search engines and so on.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hancock, David (DHANCOCK) | 2000-11-30 21:18:05 | RE: Help with Database Recovery |
Previous Message | Adam Lang | 2000-11-30 21:15:44 | Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database - more info |