Re: Array passing

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: John Lister <john(dot)lister-ps(at)kickstone(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Array passing
Date: 2009-04-08 02:16:46
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.64.0904072207470.17908@leary.csoft.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, John Lister wrote:

> Looking at the spec/docs although you can specify the return type in the
> protocol there is no way to do it.. The only way i can see is to use a
> stored procedure and specifying the return type there using
> registerOutParameter(). However looking in the code
> (SimpleParameterList) although the parameter is set to OUT, the return
> type is ignored...
>

A parameter being in-vs-out is only relevent to function arguments being
in or out, they have nothing to do with the format (text/binary) of the
data, or even the direction data is traveling (from server/client).

> Would setting the return type like this cause any problems?
>

If you could rig this up to set a flag indicating it should be binary,
that wouldn't magically make everyone else respect it and do all the
necessary conversions. You'd end up sending or receiving garbage data.

The place to start is really with the existing binary transfer patches:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2008-11/msg00000.php

I've only looked at the patches to receive data in binary form, but there
are also patches to send data in binary as well. Perhaps you can just
apply them and all will be well, if not they're a good starting point and
should at least demonstrate the scope of the problem (it's not just
setting a flag).

Kris Jurka

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Kellerer 2009-04-08 06:38:46 Re: BLOB help - yes I've read around!
Previous Message Brad Milne 2009-04-07 21:55:14 Re: BLOB help - yes I've read around!