| From: | Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-patches] unprivileged contrib and pl install |
| Date: | 2007-01-25 03:40:10 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.64.0701241937580.23712@resin.csoft.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Jeremy Drake wrote:
> I am digging through the code looking at this, and I have a question. As
> far as I can tell, there is currently no owner for a pg_language entry.
> Is this correct or is ownership information stored somewhere other than
> the pg_language relation? Are you suggesting that a lanowner column would
> need to be added?
>
Sort of answered my own question, found this comment:
* Note: for now, languages are treated as owned by the bootstrap
* user. We should add an owner column to pg_language instead.
So in the course of implementing this, an owner column would probably need
to be added to pg_language, I guess.
--
If a 6600 used paper tape instead of core memory, it would use up tape
at about 30 miles/second.
-- Grishman, Assembly Language Programming
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-01-25 03:52:02 | Re: how to plan for vacuum? |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2007-01-25 03:39:17 | Re: how to plan for vacuum? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-25 04:08:51 | pgsql: Fix for plpython functions; return true/false for boolean, |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-25 03:31:07 | Re: pg_dumpall -f <filename> option |