| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-patches] unprivileged contrib and pl install |
| Date: | 2007-01-25 05:31:32 |
| Message-ID: | 14575.1169703092@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com> writes:
>> I am digging through the code looking at this, and I have a question. As
>> far as I can tell, there is currently no owner for a pg_language entry.
Er, doh.
> Sort of answered my own question, found this comment:
> * Note: for now, languages are treated as owned by the bootstrap
> * user. We should add an owner column to pg_language instead.
> So in the course of implementing this, an owner column would probably need
> to be added to pg_language, I guess.
If you believe my idea that the DB owner ought to have special privilege
in this regard, then probably yes. Alternatively, we could hard-wire
the treatment of the DB owner.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-25 05:33:41 | Re: pg_get_domaindef |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-25 04:37:09 | Re: pg_get_domaindef |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-25 05:33:41 | Re: pg_get_domaindef |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-25 04:37:09 | Re: pg_get_domaindef |