From: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Sriram Dandapani <sdandapani(at)counterpane(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: jdbc batch insert |
Date: | 2006-09-29 16:47:41 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.63.0609291146010.8237@leary2.csoft.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Sriram Dandapani wrote:
> I have a problem where the batch inserts behave as if the transactions
> were done on a single row by single row basis. When I check the return
> value of the batch update
Transactions and affected row counts have nothing to do with each other.
> int[] updateStatus = preparedStatement.executeBatch();
>
> I get as many array entries as the number of rows inserted.
>
That's what the JDBC spec says you should get. Consider if your batches
were instead "UPDATE TAB SET x= ? WHERE y = ?". Depending on your y value
you would get a different number of updated rows, so you need one affected
row count per batch entry.
Kris Jurka
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2006-09-29 17:21:52 | Re: [JDBC] number of transactions doubling |
Previous Message | Guy Rouillier | 2006-09-29 16:44:00 | Re: Problem with driver JDBC |