Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Katie Ward <kward(at)peerdirect(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Curtis Faith <curtis(at)galtcapital(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System
Date: 2003-01-29 17:12:34
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.44.0301291211270.47421-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:

> > The code's been available for what a week or two? Do you
> > actually think that can be considered conclusive by any standard?
>
> Public beta testing (but closed source) has been going on for some
> months.

So you've been running these unscientific tests you're telling us
about being so successful for "some months"?

Vince.
--
Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and beyond! http://www.pop4.net/
http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com
Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2003-01-29 17:14:52 Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-01-29 17:11:54 Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System