| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch |
| Date: | 2001-01-23 20:19:19 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.31.0101231617330.644-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc pgsql-patches |
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I am waiting for someone to comment on this. Anyone?
>
> Seems like we need a policy decision: do we want to try to be ODBC v2 or
> v3? I don't know what else we might have to change if we want to be
> v3-compliant, so that seems like a risky way to proceed right before
> a release ...
Are we breaking anything by losing the v3-compliancy at this point? The
patch is small, so should be brain-dead to reverse at a later date *if* we
aren't breaking anything by applying it now ...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-01-23 20:24:08 | Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2001-01-23 20:17:12 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-01-23 20:24:08 | Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2001-01-23 20:17:12 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch |