Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch
Date: 2001-01-23 20:24:08
Message-ID: 200101232024.PAA00362@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc pgsql-patches


Applied, with comment about changes need for V3.

> On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > I am waiting for someone to comment on this. Anyone?
> >
> > Seems like we need a policy decision: do we want to try to be ODBC v2 or
> > v3? I don't know what else we might have to change if we want to be
> > v3-compliant, so that seems like a risky way to proceed right before
> > a release ...
>
> Are we breaking anything by losing the v3-compliancy at this point? The
> patch is small, so should be brain-dead to reverse at a later date *if* we
> aren't breaking anything by applying it now ...
>
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-23 20:25:03 Re: Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-01-23 20:19:19 Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-23 20:25:03 Re: Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-01-23 20:19:19 Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch