Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available .

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available .
Date: 2000-12-12 04:18:41
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0012120018040.29523-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > I'd almost extend that to the point that it is probably more tested right
> > now then any other feature that has been added to v7.1 pre-beta,
> > considering my knowledge of Alfred's environment ...
>
> And wasn't Alfred hollering yesterday about sudden instability?
> See the Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/include (config.h.in) thread
> over in committers.
>
> My initial guess is that he's seeing the VACUUM patch tickling a
> syscache-entry-drop problem --- if so, it shouldn't be a problem in 7.1
> --- but I have no evidence for that guess yet. I'm sure not confident
> enough of the guess to not be afraid of dropping the patch into 7.1.

should be easily testable though, no? worst case, we pull it out
afterwards ...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-12-12 04:19:09 Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available .
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-12-12 04:13:57 Re: Is VACUUM still crash-safe?