| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Gene Sokolov <hook(at)aktrad(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Problems with the new Majordomo 2. |
| Date: | 2000-05-16 16:08:07 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0005161306260.208-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > PRS ... PostReleaseSyndrome ... ppl are rebuilding up their energy,
> > watching for bugs while waiting for development to start up again.
>
> If he's only getting one or two messages a day, then something's surely
> broken! According to my maillog there were 92 messages on the pghackers
> list yesterday, and another 20+ on interfaces.
>
> However, I'm inclined to think that the breakage is on his end, since
> no one else is complaining ...
Regardless of which end is at fault, I am looking at this from our end
anyway ... I'm wondering if maybe there was a connection problem to his
system and the mail system itself just bounced it ...
> BTW, did I mention that I confirmed majordomo had lost my subscription
> to pgsql-patches? I did a who on the list and found no entry.
> Curious. Doesn't seem to have happened on any other list, but it
> explains why I've seen no patches for a good while.
I'm embarressed to say that the Mj2 guys took a look at our system logs
and, ummmm, it doesn't look like some ppl were subscribed to the
pgsql-patches list when we first moved it over :( Looks like definitely
operator error on this one *sigh*
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-05-16 16:19:00 | Re: Berkeley DB license |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-05-16 16:05:28 | Re: Berkeley DB license |