Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: M(dot)Boekhold(at)et(dot)tudelft(dot)nl
Cc: Bruce Tong <zztong(at)laxmi(dot)ev(dot)net>, James Olin Oden <joden(at)lee(dot)k12(dot)nc(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]
Date: 1998-07-24 01:56:19
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.3.96.980723225509.261G-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 23 Jul 1998, Maarten Boekhold wrote:

> > Exactly. I'm learning SQL and PostgreSQL at the same time and it is
> > sometimes difficult for me to correctly assess what belongs with each. My
> > recent GRANT/REVOKE question was like this. I didn't think for a minute
> > that would be handled by SQL since databases were created and destroyed by
> > PostgreSQL utilities.
>
> In fact, they are handled by SQL: CREATE DATABASE and DROP DATABASE. The
> createdb and destroydb tools just call these SQL statements....

Here's an odd thought:

Let's remove the "I don't want to think" utilities like
{create,destroy}{db,user} and force DBA's to actually use the *proper*
functions.

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-07-24 01:57:40 Re: [GENERAL] How about this LOGO?
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-07-24 01:53:17 Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Lynch 1998-07-24 02:29:23 Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-07-24 01:53:17 Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]