RES: RES: RES: Initial database loading and IDE x SCSI

From: <carlosreimer(at)terra(dot)com(dot)br>
To: "Mark Lewis" <mark(dot)lewis(at)mir3(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RES: RES: RES: Initial database loading and IDE x SCSI
Date: 2006-06-02 20:55:38
Message-ID: PEEPKDFEHHEMKBBFPOOKKEHJCPAA.carlosreimer@terra.com.br
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> > Many thanks Mark,
> >
> > I will consider fsync=off only to do an initial load, not for a
> database normal operation.
> >
>
> This approach works well. You just need to remember to shut down the
> database and start it back up again with fsync enabled for it to be safe
> after the initial load.
>
> > I was just thinking about this hipotetical scenario:
> > a) a restore database operation
> > b) fsync off
> > c) write-back on (IDE)
> >
> > As I could understand, in this sceneraio, it´s normal the IDE
> drive be faster than the SCSI, ok?
> >
>
> If fsync is off, then the IDE drive loses its big advantage, so IDE and
> SCSI should be about the same speed.
>
Sorry, I would like to say fsync on instead of fsync off. But I think I understood.

With fsync off the performance should be almost the same (SCSI and IDE), and with fsync on
the IDE will be faster, but data are exposed.

Thanks!

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2006-06-03 00:13:27 Re: RES: Initial database loading and IDE x SCSI
Previous Message Mark Lewis 2006-06-02 20:44:04 Re: RES: RES: Initial database loading and IDE x SCSI