Re: Bitnami deprecation

From: Rachel Roch <rroch(at)tutanota(dot)de>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Smith <n5d9xq3ti233xiyif2vp(at)protonmail(dot)ch>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bitnami deprecation
Date: 2025-08-13 12:47:24
Message-ID: OXYT85u--F-9@tutanota.de
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I think you missed this rather critical bit on the Github, Daniel ....

"Post-August 28th, 2025
- For development purposes, community-tier users are restricted to pulling only the most recent ‘latest’ tags of the limited community-tier subset of container images.
- Production users should subscribe to Bitnami Secure Images for full version support"

12 Aug 2025, 11:35 by daniel(at)yesql(dot)se:

>> On 11 Aug 2025, at 17:49, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 8/11/25 08:33, Smith wrote:
>>
>>> Not sure where to post this but the Postgres team should consider pulling the promotion for Bitnami on the downloads page.
>>> See:
>>> https://github.com/bitnami/charts/issues/35164
>>>
>
> Reading that doesn't make it obvious that we should remove Bitnami from the
> page, they are still offering (what they now call hardened images) postgresql:
>
> https://hub.docker.com/r/bitnamisecure/postgresql
>
> Looking at their catalog they are up to date with the most recent 16 minor
> release but no 17 version AFAICT.
>
> https://app-catalog.vmware.com/bitnami/apps/33ff5603-01b2-4310-a541-0d24b516cb56
>
> Keeping it on the other hand opens the question of why we aren't linking to
> other similar distributions and operators.
>
>> Yeah, going here:
>> https://bitnami.com/tag/postgresql
>> gets a 404 page.
>>
>
> Right, that clearly needs to be fixed.
>
> --
> Daniel Gustafsson
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Evelina Angelova 2025-08-13 12:54:07 help with upgrade from v15 to v16 rhel z/linux needed
Previous Message KK CHN 2025-08-13 11:23:47 Re: pgbackrest check info fails without success