Re: Bitnami deprecation

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
Cc: Smith <n5d9xq3ti233xiyif2vp(at)protonmail(dot)ch>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bitnami deprecation
Date: 2025-08-12 10:34:36
Message-ID: 96D5C4F9-08FC-432A-BBBA-AA3BD0D0A830@yesql.se
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> On 11 Aug 2025, at 17:49, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> wrote:
> On 8/11/25 08:33, Smith wrote:

>> Not sure where to post this but the Postgres team should consider pulling the promotion for Bitnami on the downloads page.
>> See:
>> https://github.com/bitnami/charts/issues/35164

Reading that doesn't make it obvious that we should remove Bitnami from the
page, they are still offering (what they now call hardened images) postgresql:

https://hub.docker.com/r/bitnamisecure/postgresql

Looking at their catalog they are up to date with the most recent 16 minor
release but no 17 version AFAICT.

https://app-catalog.vmware.com/bitnami/apps/33ff5603-01b2-4310-a541-0d24b516cb56

Keeping it on the other hand opens the question of why we aren't linking to
other similar distributions and operators.

> Yeah, going here:
> https://bitnami.com/tag/postgresql
> gets a 404 page.

Right, that clearly needs to be fixed.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2025-08-12 15:13:56 Re: Inquiry: Using PostgreSQL as a Staging Database for SAP ERP Data Export
Previous Message px shi 2025-08-12 08:37:23 Re: Questions about the continuity of WAL archiving