From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
Cc: | Smith <n5d9xq3ti233xiyif2vp(at)protonmail(dot)ch>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Bitnami deprecation |
Date: | 2025-08-12 10:34:36 |
Message-ID: | 96D5C4F9-08FC-432A-BBBA-AA3BD0D0A830@yesql.se |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> On 11 Aug 2025, at 17:49, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> wrote:
> On 8/11/25 08:33, Smith wrote:
>> Not sure where to post this but the Postgres team should consider pulling the promotion for Bitnami on the downloads page.
>> See:
>> https://github.com/bitnami/charts/issues/35164
Reading that doesn't make it obvious that we should remove Bitnami from the
page, they are still offering (what they now call hardened images) postgresql:
https://hub.docker.com/r/bitnamisecure/postgresql
Looking at their catalog they are up to date with the most recent 16 minor
release but no 17 version AFAICT.
https://app-catalog.vmware.com/bitnami/apps/33ff5603-01b2-4310-a541-0d24b516cb56
Keeping it on the other hand opens the question of why we aren't linking to
other similar distributions and operators.
> Yeah, going here:
> https://bitnami.com/tag/postgresql
> gets a 404 page.
Right, that clearly needs to be fixed.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2025-08-12 15:13:56 | Re: Inquiry: Using PostgreSQL as a Staging Database for SAP ERP Data Export |
Previous Message | px shi | 2025-08-12 08:37:23 | Re: Questions about the continuity of WAL archiving |