From: | "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Önder Kalacı <onderkalaci(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Dropped and generated columns might cause wrong data on subs when REPLICA IDENTITY FULL |
Date: | 2023-03-16 10:38:25 |
Message-ID: | OSZPR01MB6310A7627F4587CB5547086AFDBC9@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 5:23 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 6:26 PM Önder Kalacı <onderkalaci(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Attaching v2
> >
>
> Can we change the comment to: "Ignore dropped and generated columns as
> the publisher doesn't send those."? After your change, att =
> TupleDescAttr(slot1->tts_tupleDescriptor, attrnum); is done twice in
> the same function.
>
> In test cases, let's change the comment to: "The bug was that when the
> REPLICA IDENTITY FULL is used with dropped or generated columns, we
> fail to apply updates and deletes.". Also, I think we don't need to
> provide the email link as anyway commit message will have a link to
> the discussion.
>
> Did you check this in the back branches?
>
I tried to reproduce this bug in backbranch.
Generated column is introduced in PG12, and I reproduced generated column problem
in PG12~PG15.
For dropped column problem, I reproduced it in PG10~PG15. (Logical replication
was introduced in PG10)
So I think we should backpatch the fix for generated column to PG12, and
backpatch the fix for dropped column to PG10.
Regards,
Shi Yu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2023-03-16 10:47:39 | Re: [EXTERNAL] Support load balancing in libpq |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2023-03-16 10:33:27 | Re: Add a hook to allow modification of the ldapbindpasswd |