RE: Missing program_XXX calling in pgbench tests

From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Peter Eisentraut' <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: "'pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, 'Fujii Masao' <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Subject: RE: Missing program_XXX calling in pgbench tests
Date: 2025-06-05 07:44:42
Message-ID: OSCPR01MB14966FF1C4C18FF6BC6AD94D1F56FA@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Peter,

Thanks for the comment.

> Patch 0001 looks very sensible.
>
> I don't think we need to bother we the other ones. pg_config works
> differently than the other programs anyway, because --version does not
> exit the program. And pg_bsd_indent is an externally maintained
> program. So I think it is ok if these two are intentionally different.

You meant that 0002-0004 are not needed, right?
So let's put on out-of-scope...

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2025-06-05 07:50:36 Re: Potential issue in listExtensions()
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2025-06-05 07:43:49 Re: Fix slot synchronization with two_phase decoding enabled