From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Peter Eisentraut' <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
Cc: | "'pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Missing program_XXX calling in pgbench tests |
Date: | 2025-06-06 11:22:43 |
Message-ID: | 4c4f9e84-1beb-4339-af0d-48b1efe5ac96@oss.nttdata.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025/06/05 16:44, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
> Dear Peter,
>
> Thanks for the comment.
>
>> Patch 0001 looks very sensible.
>>
>> I don't think we need to bother we the other ones. pg_config works
>> differently than the other programs anyway, because --version does not
>> exit the program. And pg_bsd_indent is an externally maintained
>> program. So I think it is ok if these two are intentionally different.
>
> You meant that 0002-0004 are not needed, right?
> So let's put on out-of-scope...
I agree with Peter. I don't think patches 0002 and 0003 are necessary.
As for 0004, it adds tests for the short options -? and -V, which
duplicate the existing tests for the long options --help and --version.
I'm not sure it's worth adding tests just to confirm that the short
and long options behave the same.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA Japan Corporation
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-06-06 11:33:47 | Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication |
Previous Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2025-06-06 11:03:12 | Re: Non-reproducible AIO failure |