| From: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'Fujii Masao' <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, 'vignesh C' <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: pg_recvlogical requires -d but not described on the documentation |
| Date: | 2025-03-18 07:32:49 |
| Message-ID: | OSCPR01MB14966F6BA7B93EF637D256394F5DE2@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Fujii-san,
Thanks for giving comments and sorry for missing replies.
> I agree that the synopsis doesn't need to be updated. Attached patch clarifies
> the required options for each action in the documentation. Thought?
So, the policy David said is not to modify the synopsis part here, because there
are no rules or it is broken. Instead, we could clarify the mandatory options in
the doc, right?
I have no objections for it.
> BTW, I'm curious why --dbname isn't required for the --drop-slot action.
I'm analyzing around here...
Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2025-03-18 07:33:15 | RE: pg_recvlogical requires -d but not described on the documentation |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-03-18 07:31:06 | Re: [PATCH] Optionally record Plan IDs to track plan changes for a query |