RE: [PROPOSAL] Termination of Background Workers for ALTER/DROP DATABASE

From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Andrei Lepikhov' <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Aya Iwata (Fujitsu)" <iwata(dot)aya(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Chao Li' <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Termination of Background Workers for ALTER/DROP DATABASE
Date: 2025-10-14 04:36:01
Message-ID: OSCPR01MB14966350CC05D5AD0D339F60DF5EBA@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Andrei,

> The only question I have is whether to
> make sending a termination signal a default behaviour and let the flag
> deactivate it.

I think it can be done in future enhancement.
We can change the default behavior based on the feedback from developers.

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-10-14 05:04:24 Re: [PATCH TEST] Fix logical replication setup in subscription test `t/009_matviews.pl`
Previous Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2025-10-14 04:27:23 RE: Patch for migration of the pg_commit_ts directory