Re: [PROPOSAL] Termination of Background Workers for ALTER/DROP DATABASE

From: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Aya Iwata (Fujitsu)" <iwata(dot)aya(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Chao Li' <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Termination of Background Workers for ALTER/DROP DATABASE
Date: 2025-10-10 11:05:04
Message-ID: 43160fac-0c75-4e43-8894-2e1131075127@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/10/2025 11:04, Aya Iwata (Fujitsu) wrote:
> Thank you for your comments. I updated patch to v0006.My company also employs a large number of background workers. I also
reviewed your patch.
It looks nice to be committed. The only question I have is whether to
make sending a termination signal a default behaviour and let the flag
deactivate it.

--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov,
pgEdge

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Holger Hoffstätte 2025-10-10 11:10:35 Re: [PATCH] jit: fix build with LLVM-21
Previous Message Maxim Orlov 2025-10-10 10:55:34 Re: Patch for migration of the pg_commit_ts directory