RE: Complete data erasure

From: "asaba(dot)takanori(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <asaba(dot)takanori(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Stephen Frost' <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Complete data erasure
Date: 2020-02-10 06:57:26
Message-ID: OSBPR01MB4728E8B0AC5CFFBB290F683E8C190@OSBPR01MB4728.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Stephen,

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
> I disagree- it's a feature that's been asked for multiple times and does
> have value in some situations.

I'm rethinking the need for this feature although I think that it improves the security.
You said that this feature has value in some situations.
Could you tell me about that situations?

Regards,

--
Takanori Asaba

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2020-02-10 07:20:32 Re: WAL usage calculation patch
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-02-10 06:38:13 Re: Postgres 32 bits client compilation fail. Win32 bits client is supported?