RE: Just for fun: Postgres 20?

From: "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Jose Luis Tallon' <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Just for fun: Postgres 20?
Date: 2020-02-09 23:44:44
Message-ID: OSAPR01MB5073903B3141F9C07E31CFDFFE1E0@OSAPR01MB5073.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From: Jose Luis Tallon <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net>
>     Musing some other date-related things I stumbled upon the thought
> that naming the upcoming release PostgreSQL 20 might be preferrable to
> the current/expected "PostgreSQL 13".

+1
Users can easily know how old/new the release is that they are using.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2020-02-10 00:18:27 Re: MSVC installs too much stuff?
Previous Message Vik Fearing 2020-02-09 23:16:44 Re: Add %x to PROMPT1 and PROMPT2