Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?

From: Wolfgang Wilhelm <wolfgang20121964(at)yahoo(dot)de>
To: 'Jose Luis Tallon' <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net>, "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?
Date: 2020-02-10 11:16:28
Message-ID: 40462809.1260695.1581333388335@mail.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

And nobody is asking about all the "missing" versions like in a big red superstitious database.

Am Montag, 10. Februar 2020, 00:45:02 MEZ hat tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com> Folgendes geschrieben:

From: Jose Luis Tallon <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net>
>      Musing some other date-related things I stumbled upon the thought
> that naming the upcoming release PostgreSQL 20 might be preferrable to
> the current/expected "PostgreSQL 13".

+1
Users can easily know how old/new the release is that they are using.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2020-02-10 11:46:01 Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-02-10 11:03:31 Re: ERROR: subtransaction logged without previous top-level txn record