Hi Jacob,
I confirmed your push, LGTM.
> We don't seem to have a unified style for can't-happen elog calls, but
> I changed it to use "internal error:" to make it more clear that
> someone should tell us if it happens.
FYI, I could not find existing "internal error:" prefix in the backend codes,
but personally it looks OK. Nobody would see it. I can follow the manner when
I will add similar elog(ERROR).
Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED